Csorba v. Varo, Inc

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Csorba v. Varo, Inc. Read the opinion of the Court — 58 F.3d 636
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 25, 1997·No. 96-11181·Unpublished

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-11181 Summary Calendar

CSORBA V. VARO, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

VARO, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas (3:94-CV-1250-T) April 18, 1997

Before WISDOM, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*

Illes P. Csorba appeals the district court’s order granting

the defendant Varo’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed

the record and the briefs of the parties and find that there is no

genuine issue as to any material fact and that Varo is entitled to

judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, the district court is

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Csorba v. Varo, Inc, (5th Cir. 1997).

Csorba v. Varo, Inc (Csorba v. Varo, Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.