C.S.C-D. v. Department of Children & Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida

C.S.C-D. v. Department of Children & Families

148 So. 3d 849, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17422, 2014 WL 5320137

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 20, 2014

DocketNos. 5D14-1985, 5D14-2402

StatusPublished

This text of 148 So. 3d 849 (C.S.C-D. v. Department of Children & Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

C.S.C-D. v. Department of Children & Families, 148 So. 3d 849, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17422, 2014 WL 5320137 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See A.M. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 118 So.3d 998, 999 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (“[I]f statutory deficiencies existed in the trial court’s order, [850]*850Appellant needed to preserve these issues ‘by a motion for rehearing or ... [by otherwise bringing] the claimed deficiency to the attention of the trial court at a point when it could have been corrected.’ ” (quoting D.T. v. Fla. Dep’t of Children & Families, 54 So.3d 632, 633 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011))); R.B. v. Dep’t Children & Families, 997 So.2d 1216, 1218 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (citing Mathieu v. Mathieu, 877 So.2d 740, 741 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)).

PALMER, ORFINGER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See A.M. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 118 So.3d 998, 999 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (“[I]f statutory deficiencies existed in the trial court’s order, [850]*850Appellant needed to preserve these issues ‘by a motion for rehearing or ... [by otherwise bringing] the claimed deficiency to the attention of the trial court at a point when it could have been corrected.’ ” (quoting D.T. v. Fla. Dep’t of Children & Families, 54 So.3d 632, 633 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011))); R.B. v. Dep’t Children & Families, 997 So.2d 1216, 1218 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (citing Mathieu v. Mathieu, 877 So.2d 740, 741 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)).

PALMER, ORFINGER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 So. 3d 849, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17422, 2014 WL 5320137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/csc-d-v-department-of-children-families-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack