C.S. v. The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedApril 29, 2024
Docket1:24-cv-03232
StatusUnknown

This text of C.S. v. The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York (C.S. v. The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
C.S. v. The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC C.S., individually and on behalf of all DATE FILED: _ 4/29/2024 _ other similarly situated, Plaintiff, -against- 24 Civ. 3232 (AT) THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA ORDER UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, a New York corporation, Defendant. ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's motion seeking a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). ECF No. 4. Accordingly: 1. By April 29, 2024, at 9:00 p.m., Plaintiff shall file under seal unredacted versions of the complaint and TRO motion, and shall email copies of the same to chambers at TorresNYSDChambers @nysd.uscourts. gov; 2. By April 29, 2024, at 9:00 p.m., Plaintiff shall confirm, via email to the above-listed address, that she has complied with the requirements of Rule IV.B of the Court’s Individual Practices in Civil Cases; 3. By April 29, 2024, at 9:00 p.m., Plaintiff shall serve Defendant with an unredacted version of the complaint, the TRO motion, the motion to seal, and this order; 4. If Defendant intends to oppose entry of the TRO, it shall file opposition papers by May 1, 2024, at 5:00 p.m., 5. Plaintiff shall file any reply by May 2, 2024, at 2:00 p.m., and 6. The parties shall appear for a hearing on Plaintiffs application for a temporary restraining order on May 3, 2024, at 11:00 a.m., in Courtroom 15D of the United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007. Beyond addressing whether Plaintiff has met the standard to issue a TRO, see Citigroup Glob. Markets, Inc. v. VCG Special Opportunities Master Fund Ltd., 598 F.3d 30 (2d Cir. 2010), the parties shall be prepared to discuss: a. Whether Plaintiff has established the requirements for subject-matter jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d);

b. Whether any of Plaintiff's requests for injunctive relief risk becoming moot at the end of the school year; and c. Whether Plaintiff's TRO motion seeks “a mandatory [] injunction that alters the status quo by commanding some positive act, as opposed to a prohibitory injunction seeking only to maintain the status quo.” Cacchillo v. Insmed, Inc., 638 F.3d 401, 406 (2d Cir. 2011) (citation omitted). SO ORDERED. }- voli. New York ~__ ANALISATORRES , United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cacchillo v. Insmed, Inc.
638 F.3d 401 (Second Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
C.S. v. The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cs-v-the-trustees-of-columbia-university-in-the-city-of-new-york-nysd-2024.