C.S. v. Department of Children & Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida

C.S. v. Department of Children & Families

835 So. 2d 1276, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1129, 2003 WL 245257

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in C.S. v. Department of Children & Families. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17142 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 5, 2003·No. No. 4D02-4729·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks review of a trial court order denying his right to a state paid transcript based upon his indigency. We deny the petition. The transcript he sought was in connection with a prior appeal which this court has already determined. He did not raise this issue in that appeal and obtaining a transcript at this late- date cannot change the outcome as the mandate has already issued. The issue, therefore, is moot.

WARNER, STEVENSON and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks review of a trial court order denying his right to a state paid transcript based upon his indigency. We deny the petition. The transcript he sought was in connection with a prior appeal which this court has already determined. He did not raise this issue in that appeal and obtaining a transcript at this late- date cannot change the outcome as the mandate has already issued. The issue, therefore, is moot.

WARNER, STEVENSON and MAY, JJ., concur.

C.S. v. Department of Children & Families, 835 So. 2d 1276, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1129, 2003 WL 245257 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

835 So. 2d 1276 (C.S. v. Department of Children & Families) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.