C.S. v. Department of Children & Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida

C.S. v. Department of Children & Families

835 So. 2d 1276, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1129, 2003 WL 245257

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 5, 2003

DocketNo. 4D02-4729

StatusPublished

This text of 835 So. 2d 1276 (C.S. v. Department of Children & Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

C.S. v. Department of Children & Families, 835 So. 2d 1276, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1129, 2003 WL 245257 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks review of a trial court order denying his right to a state paid transcript based upon his indigency. We deny the petition. The transcript he sought was in connection with a prior appeal which this court has already determined. He did not raise this issue in that appeal and obtaining a transcript at this late- date cannot change the outcome as the mandate has already issued. The issue, therefore, is moot.

WARNER, STEVENSON and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks review of a trial court order denying his right to a state paid transcript based upon his indigency. We deny the petition. The transcript he sought was in connection with a prior appeal which this court has already determined. He did not raise this issue in that appeal and obtaining a transcript at this late- date cannot change the outcome as the mandate has already issued. The issue, therefore, is moot.

WARNER, STEVENSON and MAY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

835 So. 2d 1276, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1129, 2003 WL 245257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cs-v-department-of-children-families-fladistctapp-2003.