Crystina Becerra v. State
Opinion
Opinion issued March 11, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
assessed a $400 fine. On October 5, 2012, the State filed a motion to adjudicate guilt. On October 9, 2012, the trial court entered judgment adjudicating Becerra’s guilt and sentenced her to four years’ imprisonment. On January 4, 2013, Becerra filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s judgment. We dismiss the appeal.
Generally, a defendant’s notice of appeal in a criminal case is due within thirty days after the sentence is imposed in open court or the trial court enters an appealable order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). The deadline to file a notice of appeal is extended to 90 days after the date the sentence is imposed in open court if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(2). The time to file a notice of appeal may also be extended if, within 15 days after the deadline to file the notice of appeal, a party properly files a motion for extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b), 26.3.
Here, the trial court sentenced Becerra and signed a final judgment on October 9, 2012. Becerra did not file a motion for new trial nor did she file a motion for an extension of time to file her notice of appeal. Therefore, Becerra’s notice of appeal was due by November 8, 2012. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1).
Becerra untimely filed her notice of appeal on January 4, 2013. Without a timely filed notice of appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918
S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Douglas v. State, 987 S.W.2d 605, 605–06 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.).
On April 4, 2013, we notified Becerra that her appeal was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction unless, by April 15, 2013, she filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Becerra failed to file an adequate response.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Brown.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crystina Becerra v. State (Crystina Becerra v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.