Crystallus Co. v. United States

45 Cust. Ct. 212
United States Customs Court·Decided July 5, 1960·No. No. 64365; protests 213864-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United States (39 C.C.P.A. 15, C.A.D. 458), the items of merchandise marked with the letter “A” were held dutiable as [213] follows: (a) As to the items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption prior to May 28, 1950, at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 (a) ; and (b) as to items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on and after May 28,1950, at 10 percent under paragraph 1547(a), as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 52476).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crystallus Co. v. United States, 45 Cust. Ct. 212 (cusc 1960).

45 Cust. Ct. 212 (Crystallus Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United States
39 C.C.P.A. 15 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1951)