Crystal v. Manes

130 A.D.2d 979, 516 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46970
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 22, 1987
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 130 A.D.2d 979 (Crystal v. Manes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crystal v. Manes, 130 A.D.2d 979, 516 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46970 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Cross motion for leave to appeal denied. Memorandum: The order entered July 29, 1986 dismissed the second, third, fourth and fifth causes of action set forth in plaintiff’s complaint. Defendants served a copy of that order with notice of entry upon plaintiff on July 29, 1986. A subsequent order entered January 12, 1987 dismissed the remaining cause of action. We dismiss plaintiff’s appeal from the order entered July 29, 1986 as untimely. Contrary to plaintiff’s assertion, his appeal from the order entered January 12, 1987 does not bring up for review the July 29 order. CPLR 5501 (a) (1) provides that an appeal from a final judgment brings up for review any nonfinal judgment or order which necessarily affects the final judgment. Plaintiff’s appeal was from an order and not from a judgment and, therefore, it could not bring up for review the prior order. Moreover, the prior order, which dismissed several causes of action set forth in plaintiff’s complaint, was a final order and, thus, cannot be brought up for review on appeal even from an appeal from a final judgment (see, Sirlin Plumbing Co. v Maple Hill Homes, 20 NY2d 401; Matter of Burke v Axelrod, 90 AD2d 577).

We also dismiss plaintiff’s appeal and deny his cross motion for permission to appeal from the denial of his ex parte application on February 5, 1987 for an order to show cause (see, Matter of Singleton v New York State Bd. of Parole, 78 [980]*980AD2d 583; Matter of Bates v La Vallee, 33 AD2d 833; 10 Carmody-Wait 2d, NY Prac § 70:28). Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Hayden
2022 NY Slip Op 00748 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Dumond v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
2018 NY Slip Op 7853 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Hoffman v. Hoffman
31 A.D.3d 1125 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Dick v. City of New York
11 A.D.3d 239 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Hageman v. Santasiero
277 A.D.2d 1049 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Town of Coeymans v. Malphrus
252 A.D.2d 874 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Reisman v. Coleman
226 A.D.2d 693 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
In re the Estate of Parrinello
213 A.D.2d 1006 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Burke v. Crosson
647 N.E.2d 736 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Shah v. State of New York
212 A.D.2d 876 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Burke v. Crosson
191 A.D.2d 997 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Soto v. Montanez
173 A.D.2d 90 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 A.D.2d 979, 516 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crystal-v-manes-nyappdiv-1987.