Crystal v. Florida Department of Corrections

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Crystal v. Florida Department of Corrections

160 So. 3d 499, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4703, 2015 WL 1442591

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 31, 2015

DocketNo. 1D15-0008

StatusPublished

This text of 160 So. 3d 499 (Crystal v. Florida Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crystal v. Florida Department of Corrections, 160 So. 3d 499, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4703, 2015 WL 1442591 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Roderick Crystal seeks a belated appeal or belated certiorari review of an order dismissing his petition for writ of mandamus as frivolous, but we have no authority to grant a belated appeal in a civil proceeding, see Powell v. Department of Corrections, 727 So.2d 1103 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), nor do we have the authority to grant belated certiorari review. See Russell v. State, 114 So.3d 483 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). Accordingly, the petition and supplemental petition are DENIED. This disposition is without prejudice, however, to petitioner seeking relief in the lower tribunal. See generally, Milord v. Florida Parole Commission, 4 So.3d 762 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (Browning, J., concurring).

LEWIS, C.J., MARSTILLER and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Roderick Crystal seeks a belated appeal or belated certiorari review of an order dismissing his petition for writ of mandamus as frivolous, but we have no authority to grant a belated appeal in a civil proceeding, see Powell v. Department of Corrections, 727 So.2d 1103 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), nor do we have the authority to grant belated certiorari review. See Russell v. State, 114 So.3d 483 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). Accordingly, the petition and supplemental petition are DENIED. This disposition is without prejudice, however, to petitioner seeking relief in the lower tribunal. See generally, Milord v. Florida Parole Commission, 4 So.3d 762 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (Browning, J., concurring).

LEWIS, C.J., MARSTILLER and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 So. 3d 499, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4703, 2015 WL 1442591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crystal-v-florida-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack