Crystal Tree, Inc. v. Landmark Bank
847 S.W.2d 203, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 297, 1993 WL 51104
Opinion
ORDER
Plaintiffs, Crystal Tree, Inc., et al., appeal from the judgment of the trial court which directed verdict at the close of plaintiffs’ evidence in favor of defendant, Landmark Bank, et al. We have reviewed the evidence and find that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crystal Tree, Inc. v. Landmark Bank, 847 S.W.2d 203, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 297, 1993 WL 51104 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).
847 S.W.2d 203 (Crystal Tree, Inc. v. Landmark Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.