Crystal Star Cardenas v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-26-00079-CR
Crystal Star CARDENAS,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021-CR-5931 Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Lori Massey Brissette, Justice Adrian A. Spears II, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice
Delivered and Filed: May 6, 2026 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION Pursuant to a plea bargain, appellant was placed on community supervision in January 2023. On January 28, 2026, the trial court signed an “Order Amending Conditions of Community Supervision.” On January 28, 2026, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal, appearing to appeal the trial court’s order amending the conditions of community supervision. However, this court does not have jurisdiction to consider an appeal from an order altering or modifying the conditions of community supervision. See Davis v. State, 195 S.W.3d 708, 710-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006);
04-26-00079-CR
Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977); Quaglia v. State, 906 S.W.2d 112, 113 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1995, no pet.).
We therefore ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. On April 23, 2026, appellant’s counsel responded, explaining there were “no flaws with [the court’s] conclusions” and “[t]his attempted appeal . . . targets a probation modification that is simply unappealable. . . . As such, appellate counsel concedes this Court has little choice but to dismiss this attempted appeal for want of jurisdiction.”
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crystal Star Cardenas v. the State of Texas (Crystal Star Cardenas v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.