Crystal Springs Water Co. v. Atchison

267 So. 2d 694
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 3, 1972
DocketNo. 72-732
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 267 So. 2d 694 (Crystal Springs Water Co. v. Atchison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crystal Springs Water Co. v. Atchison, 267 So. 2d 694 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This petition for certiorari seeks review of an order quashing defendants’ notice of the taking of the deposition of a witness. It is the policy of this court that it will not interfere wtih the ordinary conduct of a cause by the trial court unless a clear abuse of discretion is demonstrated. See Bowen v. Manuel, Fla.App.1962, 144 So.2d 341. No such abuse of discretion has been shown by petitioners.

Petitioners’ argument that the order complained of amounts to a denial of any effective discovery does not follow from the order quashing notice of taking deposition.

Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Manuel Diaz Farms, Inc. v. Timbersteel Building, Inc.
702 So. 2d 1292 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Rosaler v. Rosaler
442 So. 2d 1018 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
ATRIO CONSOL. INDUSTRIES, INC. v. Southeast Bank
434 So. 2d 349 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Kennedy v. Kennedy
298 So. 2d 525 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
267 So. 2d 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crystal-springs-water-co-v-atchison-fladistctapp-1972.