Crystal Springs Water Co. v. Atchison

267 So. 2d 694
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 3, 1972·No. No. 72-732·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This petition for certiorari seeks review of an order quashing defendants’ notice of the taking of the deposition of a witness. It is the policy of this court that it will not interfere wtih the ordinary conduct of a cause by the trial court unless a clear abuse of discretion is demonstrated. See Bowen v. Manuel, Fla.App.1962, 144 So.2d 341. No such abuse of discretion has been shown by petitioners.

Petitioners’ argument that the order complained of amounts to a denial of any effective discovery does not follow from the order quashing notice of taking deposition.

Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crystal Springs Water Co. v. Atchison, 267 So. 2d 694 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

267 So. 2d 694 (Crystal Springs Water Co. v. Atchison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Manuel Diaz Farms, Inc. v. Timbersteel Building, Inc.
702 So. 2d 1292 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Rosaler v. Rosaler
442 So. 2d 1018 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
ATRIO CONSOL. INDUSTRIES, INC. v. Southeast Bank
434 So. 2d 349 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Kennedy v. Kennedy
298 So. 2d 525 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)