Crystal Semiconductor Corp. v. Tritech Microelectronics International, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Crystal Semiconductor Corp. v. Tritech Microelectronics International, Inc.

18 F. App'x 782

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Crystal Semiconductor Corp. v. Tritech Microelectronics International, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 246 F.3d 1336 →

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided July 24, 2000·No. Nos. 99-1558, 99-1559, 99-1560, 00-1006·Published

Opinion

Plaintiff-Appellant Crystal Semiconductor Corporation (“Crystal”) and Defendant-Cross Appellant OPTi, Inc. (“OPTi”) have entered a Settlement Agreement that resolves the underlying dispute between them. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Crystal and OPTi have agreed, inter alia, (1) to have OPTi dismissed as a party to Crystal’s appeal (No. 99-1559); (2) to dismiss OPTi’s cross-appeal (No. 99-1560); and (3) to the entry of a consent judgment in the District Court with respect to OPTi.

Crystal’s appeal (No. 99-1559) and the cross-appeals of Defendants-Cross Appellants TriTech Microelectronics International, Inc., and TriTech Microelectronics [783]*783International PTE Ltd. (“TriTech”) (Nos. 99-1558 and 00-1006) otherwise continue fully as to all issues raised by those appeals.

Accordingly, Crystal and OPTi jointly move pursuant to Rule 42(b), Fed. R.App. P., for an Order that:

1. OPTi is DISMISSED as a party to Crystal’s appeal (No. 99-1559).

Crystal’s appeal is otherwise unaffected and continues as to all other parties and issues.

2. OPTi’s cross-appeal (No. 99-1560) is DISMISSED.

3. Jurisdiction with respect to OPTi is returned to the District Court immediately upon the entry of this [Proposed] Order so that the District Court may enter a consent judgment with respect to OPTi in accordance with the Settlement Agreement between Crystal and OPTi.

Crystal and OPTi shall bear their own costs with respect to this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiff-Appellant Crystal Semiconductor Corporation (“Crystal”) and Defendant-Cross Appellant OPTi, Inc. (“OPTi”) have entered a Settlement Agreement that resolves the underlying dispute between them. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Crystal and OPTi have agreed, inter alia, (1) to have OPTi dismissed as a party to Crystal’s appeal (No. 99-1559); (2) to dismiss OPTi’s cross-appeal (No. 99-1560); and (3) to the entry of a consent judgment in the District Court with respect to OPTi.

Crystal’s appeal (No. 99-1559) and the cross-appeals of Defendants-Cross Appellants TriTech Microelectronics International, Inc., and TriTech Microelectronics [783]*783International PTE Ltd. (“TriTech”) (Nos. 99-1558 and 00-1006) otherwise continue fully as to all issues raised by those appeals.

Accordingly, Crystal and OPTi jointly move pursuant to Rule 42(b), Fed. R.App. P., for an Order that:

1. OPTi is DISMISSED as a party to Crystal’s appeal (No. 99-1559).

Crystal’s appeal is otherwise unaffected and continues as to all other parties and issues.

2. OPTi’s cross-appeal (No. 99-1560) is DISMISSED.

3. Jurisdiction with respect to OPTi is returned to the District Court immediately upon the entry of this [Proposed] Order so that the District Court may enter a consent judgment with respect to OPTi in accordance with the Settlement Agreement between Crystal and OPTi.

Crystal and OPTi shall bear their own costs with respect to this appeal.

Crystal Semiconductor Corp. v. Tritech Microelectronics International, Inc., 18 F. App'x 782 (Fed. Cir. 2000).

Pincite

18 F. App'x 782 (Crystal Semiconductor Corp. v. Tritech Microelectronics International, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.