Crymes v. Smith

401 S.E.2d 11, 260 Ga. 730
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 8, 1990·No. S90A1621·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

The present appeal from the denial of mandamus involves judicial review of an administrative decision of the local board of zoning appeals. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1) requires an application to appeal such a review whether the review is brought by mandamus or otherwise. Since an application to appeal was not filed, the appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crymes v. Smith, 401 S.E.2d 11, 260 Ga. 730 (Ga. 1990).

401 S.E.2d 11 (Crymes v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fulton County v. Congregation of Anshei Chesed
572 S.E.2d 530 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2002)
Ferguson v. Composite State Board of Medical Examiners
564 S.E.2d 715 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2002)
Rebich v. Miles
448 S.E.2d 192 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1994)