Crymes v. Smith

401 S.E.2d 11, 260 Ga. 730
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 8, 1990
DocketS90A1621
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 401 S.E.2d 11 (Crymes v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crymes v. Smith, 401 S.E.2d 11, 260 Ga. 730 (Ga. 1990).

Opinion

Per curiam.

The present appeal from the denial of mandamus involves judicial review of an administrative decision of the local board of zoning appeals. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1) requires an application to appeal such a review whether the review is brought by mandamus or otherwise. Since an application to appeal was not filed, the appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fulton County v. Congregation of Anshei Chesed
572 S.E.2d 530 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2002)
Ferguson v. Composite State Board of Medical Examiners
564 S.E.2d 715 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2002)
Rebich v. Miles
448 S.E.2d 192 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
401 S.E.2d 11, 260 Ga. 730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crymes-v-smith-ga-1990.