Cruz v. Unnamed
This text of Cruz v. Unnamed (Cruz v. Unnamed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7135
EDWIN CRUZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNNAMED DEFENDANTS; M. HARRISON, Correctional Officer, Red Onion State Prison; W. FULLER, Correctional Officer, Red Onion State Prison; J. SYKES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-95-7)
Submitted: March 12, 2003 Decided: March 26, 2003
Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edwin Cruz, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Edwin Cruz appeals the district court’s order entering
judgment pursuant to the jury’s verdict. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Cruz v. Unnamed
Defendants, No. CA-01-95-7 (W.D. Va. June 21, 2002). We deny
Cruz’s motion for transfer to another correctional facility. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cruz v. Unnamed, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cruz-v-unnamed-ca4-2003.