Cruz v. State
617 So. 2d 454, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5305, 1993 WL 139766
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cruz v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 660 So. 2d 792 →
Opinion
We vacate defendants’ sentences because the court imposed sentences in excess of the statutory maximum for second degree misdemeanors. Shaktman v. State, 529 So.2d 711, 723 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), approved, 553 So.2d 148 (Fla.1989); § 775.-082(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1989).
Defendants’ remaining point lacks merit. William v. State, 591 So.2d 664 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Flanagan v. State, 536 So.2d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).
Convictions affirmed; sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cruz v. State, 617 So. 2d 454, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5305, 1993 WL 139766 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
617 So. 2d 454 (Cruz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shaktman v. State
529 So. 2d 711 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Shaktman v. State
553 So. 2d 148 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Flanagan v. State
536 So. 2d 275 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Williams v. State
591 So. 2d 664 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)