Cruz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cruz v. State

617 So. 2d 454, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5305, 1993 WL 139766

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 4, 1993

DocketNo. 92-934

StatusPublished

This text of 617 So. 2d 454 (Cruz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cruz v. State, 617 So. 2d 454, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5305, 1993 WL 139766 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We vacate defendants’ sentences because the court imposed sentences in excess of the statutory maximum for second degree misdemeanors. Shaktman v. State, 529 So.2d 711, 723 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), approved, 553 So.2d 148 (Fla.1989); § 775.-082(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1989).

Defendants’ remaining point lacks merit. William v. State, 591 So.2d 664 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Flanagan v. State, 536 So.2d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Convictions affirmed; sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We vacate defendants’ sentences because the court imposed sentences in excess of the statutory maximum for second degree misdemeanors. Shaktman v. State, 529 So.2d 711, 723 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), approved, 553 So.2d 148 (Fla.1989); § 775.-082(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1989).

Defendants’ remaining point lacks merit. William v. State, 591 So.2d 664 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Flanagan v. State, 536 So.2d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Convictions affirmed; sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

617 So. 2d 454, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5305, 1993 WL 139766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cruz-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack