Cruz v. State

557 So. 2d 668, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1169, 1990 WL 17514
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cruz v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 760
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 1, 1990·No. No. 89-214·Published

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

The appellant, Jorge Alberto Cruz, was convicted of two counts of aggravated battery, one for stabbing a man named Little and the other for stabbing a man named Taylor. We reverse the conviction for the stabbing of Taylor because the state at trial admittedly failed to present evidence as to the identity of Taylor except through inadmissible hearsay, to which the defense interposed a timely objection. See State v. Allen, 335 So.2d 823 (Fla.1976); Graham v. State, 479 So.2d 824 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Postell v. State, 398 So.2d 851 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 411 So.2d 384 (1981). Thus, the corpus delicti of the crime charged in Count One of the information (aggravated battery of Roger Taylor) was not proven.

We find no merit in the appellant’s contention that he was improperly convicted of the stabbing of Little pursuant to Count Two of the information. That conviction is affirmed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cruz v. State, 557 So. 2d 668, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1169, 1990 WL 17514 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

557 So. 2d 668 (Cruz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Graham v. State
479 So. 2d 824 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Postell v. State
398 So. 2d 851 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
State v. Allen
335 So. 2d 823 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)