Cruz v. Saul

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. New York
DecidedAugust 18, 2025
Docket1:21-cv-01191
StatusUnknown

This text of Cruz v. Saul (Cruz v. Saul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cruz v. Saul, (E.D.N.Y. 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------x

VERONICA CRUZ,

Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM & ORDER 21-CV-1191 (EK)(LB) -against-

FRANK BISIGNANO,1

Defendant.

------------------------------------x

ERIC KOMITEE, United States District Judge: The Court has received Magistrate Judge Bloom’s Report and Recommendation (R&R) dated August 4, 2023. ECF No. 31. Judge Bloom recommends that I award attorney’s fees in the amount of $18,861.50 — twenty-five percent of the total award — pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Id. at 1. Neither party has filed objections and the time to do so has expired. Accordingly, the Court reviews Judge Bloom’s recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note to 1983 addition; accord State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Grafman, 968 F. Supp. 2d 480, 481 (E.D.N.Y. 2013).

1 Because Frank Bisignano is now the Commissioner of Social Security, he is substituted for the previous defendant Andrew Saul pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to amend the caption as set forth above. Having reviewed the record, I find no error and therefore adopt the R&R in its entirety. Thus, fees are awarded in the amount of $18,861.50 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).

Upon receipt of this sum, counsel shall remit to the plaintiff $7,412, which represents the fee awarded under the EAJA. See ECF No. 31, at 6.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Eric Komitee ERIC KOMITEE United State

s District Judge

Dated: August 18, 2025 Brooklyn, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Grafman
968 F. Supp. 2d 480 (E.D. New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cruz v. Saul, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cruz-v-saul-nyed-2025.