Cruz v. PRINCETON INSURANCE COMPANY

950 A.2d 269
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 29, 2008
Docket364-365 EAL 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 950 A.2d 269 (Cruz v. PRINCETON INSURANCE COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cruz v. PRINCETON INSURANCE COMPANY, 950 A.2d 269 (Pa. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of May 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED and the Superior Court’s decision is REVERSED in part to the extent it holds that there was no genuine issue of material fact regarding whether the use of the process was primarily used for a purpose for which it was not designed. See Wimer v. Pa. Emp. Benefit Trust Fund, 595 Pa. 627, 939 A.2d 843 (2007); see also *270 McNeil v. Jordan, 586 Pa. 413, 894 A.2d 1260 (2006). Further, this matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for consideration of the harm element of McNeil, 894 A.2d at 1275.

Justice TODD did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bobrick Corporation v. Santana Products, Inc.
698 F. Supp. 2d 479 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
950 A.2d 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cruz-v-princeton-insurance-company-pa-2008.