Cruz v. Perales
This text of 158 A.D.2d 597 (Cruz v. Perales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, we conclude that the Supreme Court acted properly in denying her request for attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 USC § 1988. The record reflects that the petitioner has neither alleged nor presented any evidence whatsoever to establish a bona fide civil rights claim pursuant to 42 USC § 1983 so as to warrant an award of attorney’s fees (see, Matter of Kross v Perales, 156 AD2d 451; Matter of Rozier v Perales, 149 AD2d 710; Matter of Gelin v Perales, 149 AD2d 593, 595). Mollen, P. J., Brown, Kooper and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 A.D.2d 597, 551 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cruz-v-perales-nyappdiv-1990.