Cruz v. Perales

158 A.D.2d 597, 551 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1985
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 20, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 158 A.D.2d 597 (Cruz v. Perales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cruz v. Perales, 158 A.D.2d 597, 551 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1985 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, we conclude that the Supreme Court acted properly in denying her request for attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 USC § 1988. The record reflects that the petitioner has neither alleged nor presented any evidence whatsoever to establish a bona fide civil rights claim pursuant to 42 USC § 1983 so as to warrant an award of attorney’s fees (see, Matter of Kross v Perales, 156 AD2d 451; Matter of Rozier v Perales, 149 AD2d 710; Matter of Gelin v Perales, 149 AD2d 593, 595). Mollen, P. J., Brown, Kooper and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ehrman v. Perales
162 A.D.2d 598 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 A.D.2d 597, 551 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cruz-v-perales-nyappdiv-1990.