Cruz v. Martins

35 A.D.3d 524, 824 N.Y.S.2d 747

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Luciano E Martins appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), dated May 5, 2005, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff-respondent.

In support of his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against him, the defendant Luciano E Martins failed to demonstrate a prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alonso v Branchinelli, 277 AD2d 408 [2000]). Thus, the motion was properly denied regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851 [1985]). Miller, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cruz v. Martins, 35 A.D.3d 524, 824 N.Y.S.2d 747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

35 A.D.3d 524 (Cruz v. Martins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Winegrad v. New York University Medical Center
476 N.E.2d 642 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Alonso v. Branchinelli
277 A.D.2d 408 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)