Cruz v. LaManna
This text of Cruz v. LaManna (Cruz v. LaManna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6654
JUAN CRUZ,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
JOHN L. LAMANNA, Warden at Federal Correctional Institution at Edgefield,
Respondent – Appellee,
and
RONALD HOLT,
Respondent.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (3:07-cv-01060-HFF)
Submitted: January 13, 2009 Decided: January 15, 2009
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Juan Cruz, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Juan Cruz, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000)
petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Cruz v. LaManna, No. 3:07-cv-01060-HFF
(D.S.C. Feb. 27, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cruz v. LaManna, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cruz-v-lamanna-ca4-2009.