Cruz v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cruz v. Goord

13 A.D.3d 948, 786 N.Y.S.2d 364, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15868

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 A.D.3d 948 (Cruz v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cruz v. Goord, 13 A.D.3d 948, 786 N.Y.S.2d 364, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15868 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding chai[949]*949lenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit drug possession, smuggling and leaving an assigned area. The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Irons v Goord, 283 AD2d 748 [2001]).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding chai[949]*949lenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit drug possession, smuggling and leaving an assigned area. The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Irons v Goord, 283 AD2d 748 [2001]).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.3d 948, 786 N.Y.S.2d 364, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cruz-v-goord-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack