Cruz v. Elhosseiny
This text of 148 A.D.2d 412 (Cruz v. Elhosseiny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Amann, J.), dated February 17, 1988, which, upon reargument, granted the defendants’ motion for a protective order limiting the place of an expert’s examination of a pathology slide to the premises of the defendant St. Vincent’s Hospital.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion to supervise discovery in directing that any examination of the pathology slide be conducted on the defendant hospital’s prem[413]*413ises. Under the circumstances it was necessary for the court to resolve a conflict between competing interests: the plaintiff’s desire to have an expert examine the slide in anonymity and the defendant’s interest in preserving the integrity of the slide. Absent some showing that the slide could be adequately preserved or reproduced for an examination by an expert in private, the court’s resolution of the issue was reasonable. Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Spatt and Balletta, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
148 A.D.2d 412, 538 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cruz-v-elhosseiny-nyappdiv-1989.