Cruz v. City of New York

7 A.D.3d 394, 776 N.Y.S.2d 469, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6970
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 18, 2004·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered April 10, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from, [395]*395granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The 10-year-old plaintiff suffered personal injury when he was pushed into a hallway window while playing “tag.” Whatever the merit to the assertion that the window was improperly maintained and already broken, the playmate’s shove that propelled the infant plaintiff into the window constituted an unforeseeable intervening act, sufficiently attenuated from defendants’ conduct as to relieve them of liability (Pena v Schur, 245 AD2d 206 [1997], lv denied 91 NY2d 811 [1998]; see also Dantzler v New York City Hous. Auth., 269 AD2d 420 [2000], lv denied 96 NY2d 710 [2001]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cruz v. City of New York, 7 A.D.3d 394, 776 N.Y.S.2d 469, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6970 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

7 A.D.3d 394 (Cruz v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ramos v. New York City Board of Education
107 A.D.3d 583 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)