Cruz Santiago v. Thong Sook Corporation
Opinion
USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED JAIME CRUZ SANTIAGO, DOC DATE FILED: 6/9/2022 □□ Plaintiff, -against- 19 Civ. 5747 (AT) THONG SOOK CORPORATION (D/B/A NOODIES ORDER THAI KITCHEN), WORAPHONG WORACHINDA, and JOYZE NUTTAKARN Defendants. ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: On April 6, 2022, the Court granted a motion allowing Plaintiff's counsel to withdraw from their representation of Plaintiff in light of Plaintiffs prolonged failure to respond to communications from his counsel. ECF No. 74. In that order, the Court directed Plaintiff to file a status letter indicating whether he intended to retain new counsel or proceed to trial in this matter on a pro se basis no later than June 1, 2022. Jd. Plaintiff has failed to do so, despite being given more than adequate time to locate new counsel or otherwise appear in this matter. The Court shall, therefore, extend this deadline for the last time. Accordingly, by June 23, 2022, Plaintiff shall file his status letter. Plaintiff is warned that failure to comply with this deadline shall result in dismissal of this matter for failure to prosecute. See Davis v. Town of Hempstead, 597 F. App’x 31, 32 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiffs last-known address, 1908 Prospect Avenue, Apt. A, Bronx, NY, 10457. SO ORDERED. Dated: June 9, 2022 New York, New York □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ ANALISA TORRES United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cruz Santiago v. Thong Sook Corporation (Cruz Santiago v. Thong Sook Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.