Cruz Romero v. Hobart Corporation
This text of Cruz Romero v. Hobart Corporation (Cruz Romero v. Hobart Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
WALDIMIR ADALBERTO CRUZ ROMERO,
Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 11-1799 (ESH) v.
ITW FOOD EQUIPMENT GROUP LLC,
Defendant.
ORDER
For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby
ORDERED that plaintiff Waldimir Adalberto Cruz Romero’s Motion to Amend the
Judgment and Include Prejudgment Interest [ECF No. 163] is DENIED; it is further
ORDERED that defendant ITW Food Equipment Group’s Motion to Stay Execution of
Judgment Pending Disposition of Post-Trial Motion and Appeal and Request for Approval of
Bond Amount [ECF No. 154] is GRANTED; it is further
ORDERED that execution of the June 10, 2015 judgment and any proceedings to
enforce it are hereby stayed pending the disposition of defendant’s renewed Motion for
Judgment as a Matter of Law [ECF No. 166] and any appeal on the condition that a supersedeas
bond is filed by August 15, 2015; and it is further
ORDERED that the amount of the proposed supersedeas bond, $3,000,000.00, is
approved. Defendant shall submit a fully executed bond for the Court’s final approval on or
before August 15, 2015. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(d). SO ORDERED.
/s/ Ellen Segal Huvelle ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE United States District Judge
Date: August 6, 2015
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cruz Romero v. Hobart Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cruz-romero-v-hobart-corporation-dcd-2015.