Cruz, Gerardo

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 13, 2019
DocketWR-89,452-01
StatusPublished

This text of Cruz, Gerardo (Cruz, Gerardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cruz, Gerardo, (Tex. 2019).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-89,452-01

EX PARTE GERARDO CRUZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 241-1534-12 IN THE 241ST DISTRICT COURT FROM SMITH COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to Fraud Possession

of a Controlled Substance/ Prescription Schedule III/IV in exchange for deferred adjudication

community supervision. His community supervision was later revoked, and he was sentenced to two

years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to

advise Applicant of the immigration and deportation consequences of his plea, as required by Padilla

v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 366-67 (2010). 2

On December 13, 2018, the trial court conducted a live habeas hearing at which the court

heard testimony and argument. The habeas record does not contain a transcription of that hearing.

As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is

the appropriate forum for findings of fact.

The trial court shall supplement the habeas record with a transcript of the habeas hearing

conducted on December 13, 2018. In addition, the trial court shall supplement the habeas record

with transcripts of Applicant’s original plea hearing and adjudication hearing. The trial court shall

also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate

to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. A

supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court

reporter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with any supplemental findings of fact and

conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 60 days of the date of this order. Any

extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: February 13, 2019

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Padilla v. Kentucky
559 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Ex Parte Rodriguez
334 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cruz, Gerardo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cruz-gerardo-texcrimapp-2019.