Cruz, A. v. P.O. MaDonna, of: Peachey, R.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Cruz, A. v. P.O. MaDonna, of: Peachey, R.

170 A.3d 1052

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 19, 2017·No. 172 EAL 2017 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of September, 2017, the Petition for Alowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is as follows:

Did [the] Commonwealth Court err in holding that a jury’s finding of intentional tort liability was sufficient to vitiate Officer Peachey’s immunity under the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act *1053 even though the jury found that he did not commit willful misconduct?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of September, 2017, the Petition for Alowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is as follows:

Did [the] Commonwealth Court err in holding that a jury’s finding of intentional tort liability was sufficient to vitiate Officer Peachey’s immunity under the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act *1053 even though the jury found that he did not commit willful misconduct?

Cruz, A. v. P.O. MaDonna, of: Peachey, R., 170 A.3d 1052 (Pa. 2017).

Pincite

170 A.3d 1052 (Cruz, A. v. P.O. MaDonna, of: Peachey, R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.