Cruthirds v. Miller

600 F. App'x 146
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 21, 2015·No. No. 15-1165·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Shelia Y. Cruthirds appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cru-thirds v. Miller, No. 5:13-cv-00849-BO, 2015 WL 507466 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cruthirds v. Miller, 600 F. App'x 146 (4th Cir. 2015).

600 F. App'x 146 (Cruthirds v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cennington v. Austin
E.D. North Carolina, 2022