Cruthird v. Superior Court Department

823 N.E.2d 1246, 443 Mass. 1017, 2005 Mass. LEXIS 105
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMarch 16, 2005
StatusPublished

This text of 823 N.E.2d 1246 (Cruthird v. Superior Court Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cruthird v. Superior Court Department, 823 N.E.2d 1246, 443 Mass. 1017, 2005 Mass. LEXIS 105 (Mass. 2005).

Opinion

In his petition, Cruthird challenged the applicability of the so-called civil litigation anniversary fee statute, G. L. c. 262, § 4D,1 to cases that were commenced before the effective date of the statute. Cruthird (as a plaintiff) had at least two such cases pending in the Superior Court at the time he filed his petition, and in each case he had moved successfully in the Superior Court to have the fee waived when it was imposed. The single justice denied the G. L. c. 211, § 3, petition without a hearing.

To the extent that Cruthird sought to use his petition to obtain relief in his own two cases, the single justice correctly denied the petition because no relief was needed. The fees had already been waived in both cases by judges in the Superior Court. Insofar as Cruthird sought to use his petition to obtain a declaration that the anniversary fee statute was unconstitutional generally, and purports to pursue the present appeal on that basis, the matter is moot in light of the statute’s repeal.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 3
Massachusetts § 3
§ 4D
Massachusetts § 4D

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
823 N.E.2d 1246, 443 Mass. 1017, 2005 Mass. LEXIS 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cruthird-v-superior-court-department-mass-2005.