Crutchfield v. State

205 S.W.2d 374, 151 Tex. Crim. 3, 1947 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 999
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Crutchfield v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 148 Tex. Crim. 399
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 29, 1947·No. No. 23705·Published

Opinion

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of an assault with a prohibited weapon, and given a term of three years in the state penitentiary, and he appeals.

It is evident from the record that appellant conducted his own defense, and he here presents no bills of exceptions relative to any matters that occurred during his trial. It is true that this court has been the recipient of many letters from him concerning the conduct of the Trial with which he now evidences dissatisfaction, and in such letters we find the mention of matters which do not appear in the record. However, we are bound by the record and are not permitted under the law to consider matters not appearing therein. We have carefully read the record presented to us, which is certified to by the reporter, and approved by the trial judge, as well as agreed to by the appellant and the District Attorney. From such record we are convinced that the testimony sufficiently shows appellant’s guilt of the offense charged in the indictment, with no errors in the trial present.

The judgment will therefore be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crutchfield v. State, 205 S.W.2d 374, 151 Tex. Crim. 3, 1947 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 999 (Tex. 1947).

205 S.W.2d 374 (Crutchfield v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.