Crutchfield v. State

132 S.W.2d 857, 137 Tex. Crim. 572, 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 519
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 8, 1939·No. No. 20554.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

GRAVES, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of the unlawful possession of . intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, in a dry area, and given a term of five months in jail.

The facts are identical with those in Frank Crutchfield v. State, No. 20553, this day decided, (Page 569 of this volume) but we find that they are of less probative force, when applied to this cause, than they were in cause No. 20553. We observe that this appellant was never seen by any witness to stoop over near where the intoxicating liquor was afterwards found to have been concealed, nor is it shown how closely he had approached to such liquor’s hiding place.

We do not think a review of the testimony is necessary herein, but refer to that set out in cause No. 20553. Under the reasoning therein set forth, and for the insufficiency of the testimony, this judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crutchfield v. State, 132 S.W.2d 857, 137 Tex. Crim. 572, 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 519 (Tex. 1939).

132 S.W.2d 857 (Crutchfield v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill v. State
334 S.W.2d 303 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Venegas v. State
311 S.W.2d 867 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1958)
Walker v. State
163 S.W.2d 207 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1942)