Crutchfield v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Crutchfield v. State

120 S.E. 18, 31 Ga. App. 183, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 829

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 15, 1923

Docket14985

StatusPublished

This text of 120 S.E. 18 (Crutchfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crutchfield v. State, 120 S.E. 18, 31 Ga. App. 183, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 829 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant in this case contends that his conviction of the crime of which he was charged was not authorized by the evidence, and he further contends that the court erred in [184]*184overruling certain objections to testimony. The evidence fully authorized the conviction, and the court property overruled his objections to the testimony complained of. The court having approved the verdict, it was proper to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworih, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The defendant in this case contends that his conviction of the crime of which he was charged was not authorized by the evidence, and he further contends that the court erred in [184]*184overruling certain objections to testimony. The evidence fully authorized the conviction, and the court property overruled his objections to the testimony complained of. The court having approved the verdict, it was proper to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworih, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 S.E. 18, 31 Ga. App. 183, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crutchfield-v-state-gactapp-1923.