Crutchfield v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Crutchfield v. State

105 So. 923, 21 Ala. App. 666

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 4, 1925

Docket4 Div. 97.

StatusPublished

This text of 105 So. 923 (Crutchfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crutchfield v. State, 105 So. 923, 21 Ala. App. 666 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

The defendant, a 19 year old boy, was convicted of the offense of having sexual intercourse with a girl over the age of 12 and under the age of 16. On this appeal, what purports to be a bill of exceptions does not appear to have been signed by the presiding judge, and cannot, therefore, be considered by us. Rowe v. Buttram et al., 180 Ala. 456, 61 So. 258. The record proper being in regular form, and no prejudicial error appearing, it follows that the judgment of conviction must be affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

The defendant, a 19 year old boy, was convicted of the offense of having sexual intercourse with a girl over the age of 12 and under the age of 16. On this appeal, what purports to be a bill of exceptions does not appear to have been signed by the presiding judge, and cannot, therefore, be considered by us. Rowe v. Buttram et al., 180 Ala. 456, 61 So. 258. The record proper being in regular form, and no prejudicial error appearing, it follows that the judgment of conviction must be affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 So. 923, 21 Ala. App. 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crutchfield-v-state-alactapp-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack