Crutchfield v. Kelly

125 A.D.2d 955, 510 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 63136
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 19, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 125 A.D.2d 955 (Crutchfield v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crutchfield v. Kelly, 125 A.D.2d 955, 510 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 63136 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: It was error for Special Term to vacate the determination of the Hearing Officer based on inadequate employee assistance. In order for the issue to have been preserved, petitioner should have raised it before the Hearing Officer where the error, if any, could have been rectified (Matter of Humphries v Coughlin, 112 AD2d 561, 562; Matter of Geddes v Wilmot, 111 AD2d 474, 475, appeal dismissed 66 NY2d 914). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J. — art 78.) Present —Doerr, J. P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ramos v. Kelly
152 A.D.2d 932 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Pisani v. Kelly
147 A.D.2d 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 A.D.2d 955, 510 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 63136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crutchfield-v-kelly-nyappdiv-1986.