Crutchfield v. Heck

134 Ala. 670
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1902·Published

Opinion

The bill in this case was filed by the appellant aganist the appellees, for the purpose of enjoining the enforcement of a judgment at law. A preliminary injunction was issued. The defendants made a motion to dissolve the injunction and to dismiss the bill, and also filed demurrers to the bill.

On the submission of the cause upon these motions and the demurrers, the chancellor rendered a decree sus[671] taining the demurrers and ordered the injunction dissolved and the hill dismissed.

From this decree the complainant appeals, and assigns the rendition thereof as error.

The decree is affirmed, the court holding that according to the averments of the bill, the complainant had an adequate remedy at law.

Opinion by

Sharpe, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crutchfield v. Heck, 134 Ala. 670 (Ala. 1902).

134 Ala. 670 (Crutchfield v. Heck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.