Crutcher v. Keith
This text of 5 Ky. Op. 46 (Crutcher v. Keith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the Court by
B. H. Crutcher, one of the parties to whom the appellee Darr executed the bond for the conveyance of the house and lot in Owensboro, in his answer professes his willingness to execute the contract for the exchange, and that the money may be paid to relieve the house and lot from the incumbrance of the vendor’s lien, so as to secure-a good title.
The judgment complained of recites the fact that Webber, to whom the purchase money for the house and lot was due, had been paid by Keith, the appellee, and it is 'but equitable that he should have the benefit of his security, especially as no injury can result to appellants.
Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Ky. Op. 46, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crutcher-v-keith-kyctapp-1872.