Crutcher-Tufts Corp. v. Coleman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Crutcher-Tufts Corp. v. Coleman

170 So. 3d 972, 2015 La. LEXIS 1394, 2015 WL 3616103

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 22, 2015·No. No. 2015-OC-0340·Published

Opinion

In re Alise Durand; Douglas J. Du-rand; — Defendant(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. N, No. 2013-11628; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2014-C-1416.

Granted. Although the trial court set the return date more than thirty days from the date of the ruling, the court has authority to extend the deadline under Rule 4-3. Relators’ application, filed within the time limit authorized by the trial court, is timely. See Barnard, v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), 675 So.2d 734. Accordingly, the ruling of the court of appeal is vacated and set aside, and the application is remanded to the court of appeal for consideration on the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Alise Durand; Douglas J. Du-rand; — Defendant(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. N, No. 2013-11628; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2014-C-1416.

Granted. Although the trial court set the return date more than thirty days from the date of the ruling, the court has authority to extend the deadline under Rule 4-3. Relators’ application, filed within the time limit authorized by the trial court, is timely. See Barnard, v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), 675 So.2d 734. Accordingly, the ruling of the court of appeal is vacated and set aside, and the application is remanded to the court of appeal for consideration on the merits.

Crutcher-Tufts Corp. v. Coleman, 170 So. 3d 972, 2015 La. LEXIS 1394, 2015 WL 3616103 (La. 2015).

Pincite

170 So. 3d 972 (Crutcher-Tufts Corp. v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related