Crussiah v. Colvin
589 F. App'x 76
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 22, 2014
DocketNo. 14-2085
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 589 F. App'x 76 (Crussiah v. Colvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Crussiah v. Colvin, 589 F. App'x 76 (4th Cir. 2014).
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Joseph Crussiah appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting summary judgment to Appellee.
AFFIRMED.
The parties consented to the exercise of juris- ■ diction by the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jurisdiction, powers, and temporary assignment
28 U.S.C. § 636(c)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
589 F. App'x 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crussiah-v-colvin-ca4-2014.