Crussiah v. Attia

675 F. App'x 319
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 2, 2017
DocketNo. 16-1967
StatusPublished

This text of 675 F. App'x 319 (Crussiah v. Attia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crussiah v. Attia, 675 F. App'x 319 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

[320]*320Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Crussiah appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Crussiah v. Attia, No. 8:15-cv-02516-PX, 2016 WL 3997315 (D. Md. July 26, 2016). We deny Crussiah’s motion for judicial notice and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
675 F. App'x 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crussiah-v-attia-ca4-2017.