Crussiah v. Attia

Fourth Circuit

Crussiah v. Attia

675 F. App'x 319

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 2, 2017·No. No. 16-1967·Published

Opinion

[320] Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Crussiah appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Crussiah v. Attia, No. 8:15-cv-02516-PX, 2016 WL 3997315 (D. Md. July 26, 2016). We deny Crussiah’s motion for judicial notice and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[320] Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Crussiah appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Crussiah v. Attia, No. 8:15-cv-02516-PX, 2016 WL 3997315 (D. Md. July 26, 2016). We deny Crussiah’s motion for judicial notice and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Crussiah v. Attia, 675 F. App'x 319 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

675 F. App'x 319 (Crussiah v. Attia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related