Cruson v. Coots

Indiana Court of Appeals

Cruson v. Coots

60 N.E. 1124, 26 Ind. App. 697, 1901 Ind. App. LEXIS 338

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 26, 1901

DocketNo. 3,785

StatusPublished

This text of 60 N.E. 1124 (Cruson v. Coots) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cruson v. Coots, 60 N.E. 1124, 26 Ind. App. 697, 1901 Ind. App. LEXIS 338 (Ind. Ct. App. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The assignment of error is that the circuit court erred in overruling appellants’ motion for a new trial. The ground upon which the new trial was asked by part of appellants was, “ that the verdict and judgment herein is not sustained by the evidence and is contrary to law.” The other appellants by their motion present the same question.

The evidence is in the record. The case was tried by the court without a jury. There is evidence fairly supporting the judgment. It is therefore affirmed. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The assignment of error is that the circuit court erred in overruling appellants’ motion for a new trial. The ground upon which the new trial was asked by part of appellants was, “ that the verdict and judgment herein is not sustained by the evidence and is contrary to law.” The other appellants by their motion present the same question.

The evidence is in the record. The case was tried by the court without a jury. There is evidence fairly supporting the judgment. It is therefore affirmed. ■

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 N.E. 1124, 26 Ind. App. 697, 1901 Ind. App. LEXIS 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cruson-v-coots-indctapp-1901.