Crumpton v. State

52 Ark. 273
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 15, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 52 Ark. 273 (Crumpton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crumpton v. State, 52 Ark. 273 (Ark. 1889).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Witnesses: Bias of. During the trial of the appellant, a witness introduced by him was asked if he had not made certain statements, which, if made, tended to show that he felt an interest in the defendant’s behalf. He denied that he had made the statements, and the State was permitted, against his objection, to prove that he had made them. The bias of one called to testify in a case is not a collateral matter. The testimony was competent. Butler v. State, 34 Ark., 480; Whar. Cr. Ev., sec. 483.

Instructions. It is urged that the court erred in instructing the jury as to the law of manslaughter, against the appellant’s objection. We cannot say there was no testimony to justify a conviction of manslaughter. Affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goodwin v. State
568 S.W.2d 3 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1978)
Wright v. State
201 S.W. 1107 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1918)
McCain v. State
195 S.W. 363 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1917)
Paxton v. State
170 S.W. 80 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1914)
Peters v. State
146 S.W. 491 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1912)
Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Belknap
98 S.W. 366 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 Ark. 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crumpton-v-state-ark-1889.