Crumpton v. McDowell

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Crumpton v. McDowell

721 So. 2d 697, 1998 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 297, 1998 WL 178776

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Crumpton v. McDowell. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 894 →

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided April 17, 1998·No. 2950735·Published

Opinion

On Remand from the Supreme Court

YATES, Judge.

A portion of the prior judgment of this court has been reversed by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the case remanded. See Ex parte McDowell, 721 So.2d 694 (Ala. 1998). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is reinstated.

JUDGMENT REINSTATED.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and MONROE, CRAWLEY, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Remand from the Supreme Court

YATES, Judge.

A portion of the prior judgment of this court has been reversed by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the case remanded. See Ex parte McDowell, 721 So.2d 694 (Ala. 1998). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is reinstated.

JUDGMENT REINSTATED.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and MONROE, CRAWLEY, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Crumpton v. McDowell, 721 So. 2d 697, 1998 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 297, 1998 WL 178776 (Ala. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

721 So. 2d 697 (Crumpton v. McDowell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related