Crumpler v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Crumpler v. . R. R.

63 S.E. 1134, 150 N.C. 788, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 149

DecidedMarch 10, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 63 S.E. 1134 (Crumpler v. . R. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crumpler v. . R. R., 63 S.E. 1134, 150 N.C. 788, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 149 (N.C. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant appealed. Upon a consideration of the entire record the Court is of opinion that, upon all the evidence, the plaintiff is entitled to recover the penalty sued for, as found by the jury in response to the third issue. The Court is of opinion that there is no evidence of actual damage which in law entitles the plaintiff to recover and that the court below should have so ruled. The defendant's contention in respect to the fifth issue is sustained. The judgment for the penalty of $85 is affirmed.

Modified and affirmed.

(789)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant appealed. Upon a consideration of the entire record the Court is of opinion that, upon all the evidence, the plaintiff is entitled to recover the penalty sued for, as found by the jury in response to the third issue. The Court is of opinion that there is no evidence of actual damage which in law entitles the plaintiff to recover and that the court below should have so ruled. The defendant's contention in respect to the fifth issue is sustained. The judgment for the penalty of $85 is affirmed.

Modified and affirmed.

(789)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 S.E. 1134, 150 N.C. 788, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crumpler-v-r-r-nc-1909.