Crump v. Eckerd's, Inc.

85 S.E.2d 607, 241 N.C. 489, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 390
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 4, 1955·No. 527·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Parker, J.

Eckerd’s, Inc., is a Forth Carolina corporation. Eckérd Drugs, Inc., is a Delaware corporation.

G-.S. 1-163 is captioned “Amendments in Discretion of Court.” The material part of this statute reads: “The judge or court may, before and after judgment, in furtherance of justice, and on such terms as may be proper, amend any pleading, process or proceeding, ... by correcting a mistake in the name of a party . . .”

It is not necessary for us to decide whether the plaintiff by his motion is seeking to correct a mistake in the name of the defendant, or is seeking to substitute a different corporation for the present defendant without service of process. The trial court in its discretion denied plaintiff’s motion. No manifest abuse of discretion is made to appear. The court’s ruling is not subject to review. Gordon v. Gas Co., 178 N.C. 435, 100 S.E. 878; Hogsed v. Pearlman, 213 N.C. 240, 195 S.E. 789; Byers v. Byers, 223 N.C. 85, 25 S.E. 2d 466; Pharr v. Pharr, 223 N.C. 115, 25 S.E. 2d 471.

The judgment of the lower court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crump v. Eckerd's, Inc., 85 S.E.2d 607, 241 N.C. 489, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 390 (N.C. 1955).

85 S.E.2d 607 (Crump v. Eckerd's, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moody v. Town of Carrboro
271 S.E.2d 265 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1980)
Hill v. Shanks
170 S.E.2d 116 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1969)
Consolidated Vending Co. v. Turner
148 S.E.2d 531 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)