Crump v. Argarwal
This text of Crump v. Argarwal (Crump v. Argarwal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8542
DAVID CRUMP, a/k/a David Lee Crump, Sr.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DOCTOR ARGARWAL, Deputy Director of N.C. Department of Corrections Healthcare; BOYD BENNETT, Director for N.C. Department of Corrections; CARLTON B. JOYNER, Director of Case Management; STEVE BAILEY, Western Regional Area Director for N.C. Department of Corrections; SID HARKELROAD, a/k/a Sidney Harkelroad, Superintendent at Marion Correctional Institution,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00495-GCM)
Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 8, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Crump, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
David Crump appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Crump
v. Argarwal, No. 1:08-cv-00495-GCM (W.D.N.C. Dec. 1, 2008). We
deny Crump’s pending motion to compel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Crump v. Argarwal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crump-v-argarwal-ca4-2009.