Crummey v. Crummey

180 S.E. 493, 180 Ga. 735, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 546
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 13, 1935
DocketNo. 10835
StatusPublished

This text of 180 S.E. 493 (Crummey v. Crummey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crummey v. Crummey, 180 S.E. 493, 180 Ga. 735, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 546 (Ga. 1935).

Opinion

Gilbert, Justice.

Under tlie pleadings and evidence it can not be said that the judge abused bis discretion in allowing temporary alimony and the grant of interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.. M. B. Wood, for plaintiff in error. Jap H. Highsmith, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 S.E. 493, 180 Ga. 735, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crummey-v-crummey-ga-1935.