Crummer Co. v. DuPont

Supreme Court

Crummer Co. v. DuPont

344 U.S. 851

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 20, 1952

DocketNo. 107

StatusPublished

This text of 344 U.S. 851 (Crummer Co. v. DuPont) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crummer Co. v. DuPont, 344 U.S. 851 (1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for [852]*852the Fifth Circuit denied.

Robert J. Pleus, Chris Dixie and Joseph P. Lea, Jr. for petitioners. Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, Ralph McLane, Assistant Attorney General, Henry P. Adair, Donald Russell, Charles R. Scott and H. M. Voorhis for respondents. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for [852]*852the Fifth Circuit denied.

Robert J. Pleus, Chris Dixie and Joseph P. Lea, Jr. for petitioners. Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, Ralph McLane, Assistant Attorney General, Henry P. Adair, Donald Russell, Charles R. Scott and H. M. Voorhis for respondents. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

344 U.S. 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crummer-co-v-dupont-scotus-1952.