Crumley Bros. v. Bryan & Co.
This text of 69 Ala. 91 (Crumley Bros. v. Bryan & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Each of these appeals is taken from a judgment of the circuit court overruling a motion to “ dismiss ” or “discharge” the levy of an attachment on certain goods of the defendants, and from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to a plea in abatement to the attachment in each case.
If we regard the motion as equivalently one to dismiss or quash, the appeals must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction in this court, on the ground that the statute authorizes an appeal from such interlocutory rulings to the circuit court to be prosecuted only on the condition precedent, that “ the consent of the opposite party, or his' attorney is obtained to its being taken.” — Code, 1816, § 3917.
There is no such consent shown by the record, and the judgment is, therefore, that the appeal be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 Ala. 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crumley-bros-v-bryan-co-ala-1881.