Crumbley v. Crumbley
This text of 362 So. 2d 96 (Crumbley v. Crumbley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An appeal from an order directing appellant to pay arrearages in child support upon pain of being sentenced for contempt. The trial court’s order is deficient only in its failure to make the findings of fact required by Faircloth v. Faircloth, 339 So.2d 650 (Fla. 1976). See also Garo v. Garo, 347 So.2d 418 (Fla. 1977).
The order from which the appeal is taken will be affirmed, but further proceedings upon that order, in the nature of sanctions for contempt, must be predicated upon further findings as required by Faircloth, supra.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
362 So. 2d 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crumbley-v-crumbley-fladistctapp-1978.