Crumbley v. Crumbley

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Crumbley v. Crumbley

362 So. 2d 96

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 17, 1978·No. No. II-443·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An appeal from an order directing appellant to pay arrearages in child support upon pain of being sentenced for contempt. The trial court’s order is deficient only in its failure to make the findings of fact required by Faircloth v. Faircloth, 339 So.2d 650 (Fla. 1976). See also Garo v. Garo, 347 So.2d 418 (Fla. 1977).

The order from which the appeal is taken will be affirmed, but further proceedings upon that order, in the nature of sanctions for contempt, must be predicated upon further findings as required by Faircloth, supra.

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, Acting C. J., and MELVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

An appeal from an order directing appellant to pay arrearages in child support upon pain of being sentenced for contempt. The trial court’s order is deficient only in its failure to make the findings of fact required by Faircloth v. Faircloth, 339 So.2d 650 (Fla. 1976). See also Garo v. Garo, 347 So.2d 418 (Fla. 1977).

The order from which the appeal is taken will be affirmed, but further proceedings upon that order, in the nature of sanctions for contempt, must be predicated upon further findings as required by Faircloth, supra.

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, Acting C. J., and MELVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Crumbley v. Crumbley, 362 So. 2d 96 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

362 So. 2d 96 (Crumbley v. Crumbley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related